|
Stacy
Codikow is one of the founders of POWER UP, a
non-profit organization with chapters in L.A.,
New York, and Chicago designed to "promote
the visibility and integration of gay women in
entertainment, the arts, and all forms of
media."
Why
did you found POWER UP and are there any other
organizations out there doing some of the same
things? How has POWER UP evolved since its
inception?
POWER
UP was created to fill a void in the Lesbian
community. As a community, we lack in resources
for women to share or communicate with one
another. We have no restaurants, coffee houses,
maybe 3 bars and a couple “girls” nights
here and there. POWER UP is unique in that
it’s a club, were membership means you belong.
A virtual lesbian community, arts, and
entertainment center in the heart of West
Hollywood. We are the only non-profit
organization who finances, produces, and
distributes films made by our membership to the
industry at large. When we started we thought
maybe we would have a hundred members and get
togethers, but quickly we became a national
organization with nearly 900 members and
chapters in Chicago and LA. We plan to launch
San Francisco this year.
What
are the membership requirements?
Fill
out an application and make a donation. It’s
that simple.
You’ve
had a lot of major corporate sponsors for your
events and fundraising efforts; why do you think
these companies are interested in supporting
your organization, and have you encountered any
challenges with this?
Corporations
realize that the gay women’s community is an
untapped market of double income family’s with
expendable money that would be interested in
their products. Most companies that we have
approached realize the value of what we do and
create and really want to be a part of it.
How
has the mainstream Hollywood press responded to
your organization, and has this changed over
time?
They
have embraced us from the start. The Hollywood
Reporter had a ½ page photo of POWER UP with an
article about us mentoring women in their 2000
Most Important Women in Hollywood issue. We have
been included a half a dozen times in both the
Reporter and Variety reporting on such things as
the film grant program, our honorary board of
directors, and our mentorship programs.
What’s
the biggest challenge you face as an
organization today, and how is that different
from those you faced when you first launched in
2000?
The
biggest challenge is trying to maintain the
programs and events we have become known for and
trying to create new opportunities for our
members at the same time. As the group grows it
takes on new faces and creative ideas that we
want our membership to realize and take full
advantage of. I guess I am trying to say, the
group grows, shifts, changes, expands and
membership needs to keep up with the
possibilities and continue to participate in the
evolution.
You
just rolled out the first full-length screenplay
competition (in addition to your existing
filmmaking competition); any plans to expand
into even more competitions soon?
Well,
this year we are into our third filmmaking grant
program where three directors are paired with
three writers to make three short films. The
feature screenplay competition this summer will
also have three winners who receive money,
software and introductions to several agents and
managers. We have had a competition to
“shadow” a director on Six Feet Under
and are planning on creating “shadowing” of
writers and directors on a series later this
year.
What
do you base your decision on when choosing
winners in your competitions?
The
film grant competition is open to professional
members. The scripts cannot be longer than 15
pages and are judged on the quality of the
writing, the idea, and execution. They can be on
any subject and do not have to be gay themed.
All screenplays have the writers name removed to
add a greater sense of non-bias. The tapes are
judged on talent and all filmgrants applications
are chosen by the member of the Honorary Board
of Directors. The screenplay competition will be
open to members and non-members alike. These
scripts will be judged on the quality of the
best scripts. Again any subject and do not have
to be gay themed.
What
kind of success have your grant winners seen
since she started awarding them?
We
have had grant winners who have written for TV,
won the Student Academy Award, been hired to
direct a feature film, hired to write a
screenplay for Universal, but perhaps the most
famous over night success was Angela
Robinson’s D.E.B.S. that was an
official selection of the Sundance Film
Festival, the Berlin Film Festival, got Angela a
writing job on Earthlings
and is being made into a feature films by Screen
Gems.
You
mentioned in a recent interview that you’d
like to see more films about people who just
happen to be gay (like, a gay Jaws or Sound
of Music); do you see any trend in that
direction in Hollywood?
No,
“Hollywood” puts out Boat Trip
where straight guys play gay for
laughs--Hollywood makes movies that make fun of
diversity and it sell tickets……I think it
will be up to Gay Hollywood to take on that
responsibility.
What
kinds of differences do you perceive in the way
movies with gay male themes are received and
promoted versus films with lesbian characters
and themes?
Well,
distributors put more money behind the male
films, because they believe there is an
audience. Women have a reputation for not being
an audience. I think that is wrong and all
people want to see stories that depict there
world and women could support a bigger release
if the distributors would put the money behind a
good film.
What’s
your perspective on how easy or difficult it is
to be a gay woman and work in the entertainment
industry, and how has that changed over time?
Does it seem like this varies by job type (i.e.
actress vs. director vs. editor etc.)?
I
believe, if you believe in yourself, your talent
and your drive, that you can make it anywhere.
Lots of people feel that they must fit in and
that is what is dictated to them through their
career. I have never felt in my career as a
producer and writer that being gay in anyway
hindered my opportunities.
Have
you had any difficulty recruiting board members
or even regular members because they are afraid
to be affiliated with such an explicitly lesbian
organization?
An
“explicitly lesbian organization” is not how
I see POWER UP. We have male, female, straight
and gay members and supporters. Our mission is
about integration. I suppose if you feel shame
you may not what to be a part of POWER UP, but I
think for the most part women are pleased to
know it’s there. That there is a place for
them.
Someone
the other day referred to your organization
jokingly as The Lesbian Mafia (in the sense that
you’re all about looking out for gay women in
entertainment); do you think this is idea of gay
women helping other gay women is valued by your
members? Any success stories resulting from the
informal networking opportunities you offer
members (rather than the more formal
competitions)?
People
should look out for, help and guide anyone whom
they believe in. As gay women we need to empower
and support one another. That does not mean
because you are gay you should be entitled to
anything or because you are a member that you
should expect anything beyond what you are
willing to put in. POWER UP is about opportunity
and exposure.
Several
of our members have created production companies
together, made films together, hired one another
to crew, have gotten jobs writing for several
magazines and our quarterly, had meeting with
agents, managers, producers, we have introduced
several members to casting directors and had
pitching opportunities too.
Everyday
is another opportunity for networking,
communicating, and advancing, but you can’t
win if you don’t play.
Note:
For more information or to become a member go to
Power-Up.net
|